When David McKinnon learned that the blood
transfusion he received during surgery as a young man had infected him
with hepatitis C, he began the process of applying for compensation from
the federal government.
Mr. McKinnon,
who was among the thousands of victims of one of the most tragic health
scandals in Canadian history, wanted to ensure that his wife, Elizabeth,
and their six children were cared for.
He passed away in 2010 at the age of 50,
four weeks after tumours on his liver related to the disease surfaced
for a second time. But his widow is still waiting for the money that was
promised by the government.
“We
spent all kinds of money and time to get all of the documentation that
was required for the file to be accepted. It took probably two years,”
Elizabeth McKinnon said in a telephone interview from her home on
Vancouver Island on Thursday. “And there has been nothing but ‘we have
to wait for this court hearing and that judgment.’”
The
McKinnons are among the victims, and families of victims, who are
entitled to a share of the compensation package that was offered by the
federal government in 2007 because of the inadequate safeguards that had
been placed on the Canadian blood supply. But because the
billion-dollar fund for those who were infected with the hepatitis C
virus (HCV) through tainted blood before 1986 or after 1990 has run dry,
more than 300 claims have gone unpaid.
There
is another pot of cash for people who contracted HCV between 1986 and
1990, which has an estimated surplus of $240-million. Health Minister
Jane Philpott has been repeatedly asked by claimants, their lawyers and
backbench MPs to transfer part of the surplus to the empty fund so
victims such as Ms. McKinnon and her children can get what they are
owed.
But the Liberal government has so
far refused to entertain the idea. And Justice Department lawyers will
be in court next week to argue that any excess in the 1986-to-1990 fund
should be returned to federal coffers.
Ms.
McKinnon and her MP, New Democrat Alastair MacGregor, are among those
who have written to Dr. Philpott to ask for the empty fund to be topped
up with the estimated $60-million that is required to pay the remaining
claimants.
“The Health Minister wrote
back a very nice letter to say she was sorry to hear that we were in
this situation, but basically she was not going to support or advocate
for us that the funds be transferred. She felt it was out of her
jurisdiction to do that,” Ms. McKinnon said. “The money is there. Should
it not go to those deserving families and people?”
When
asked this week about the unpaid claims, Dr. Philpott’s spokesman
wrote, “The courts have the jurisdiction to make decisions regarding the
sufficiency of the funds and the allocation of any surplus within the
parameters set out in each settlement agreement, but, they do not have
the authority to order a transfer between agreements.”
That
is of little solace to Cynthia Carter of Victoria, who was diagnosed
with hepatitis C last year after contracting the disease during a blood
transfusion in 1982. As with Ms. McKinnon, Ms. Carter has applied for
compensation but knows there is no money left in the fund.
Ms.
Carter, 64, had been the secretary at a small rural school. It was a
job that she loved but her declining health made it impossible for her
to continue.
“I did take early
retirement because I was unwell,” she said. “So that represents quite a
loss of income to me through not working, through my pension, and so
on.”
Ms. Carter said it would be
“appalling” if she ultimately gets none of the money to which she is
entitled. The compensation is an acknowledgment of the damage that was
done, she said. “And for me not to be compensated is like a slap in the
face that says you are not important enough.”
A
British Columbia man named Fred Girling, whose wife died of hepatitis C
after receiving a transfusion of tainted blood, has started an online
petition asking for the Liberal government to respect the purpose of the
fund. Mr. Girling and his wife were compensated, but he is still
waiting for an amount that would replace her lost earnings.
Don
Davies, the NDP Health critic, said it is disappointing, unfair and
somewhat deceptive on the part of the government not to pay victims of
the tainted blood scandal the money they are owed.
“There
is nothing that prevents the federal government from extending that
money to those victims,” he said. Instead, the government “ is greedily
trying to take the money back and using technical arguments to defeat
what are obviously legitimate claims.”
Colin Carrie, the Conservative Health critic agreed.
“They
could make it happen if they really wanted to,” said Mr. Carrie. “Any
surplus in those funds should be allocated to the victims because that’s
what it was there for. And anything we can do to enhance their
benefits, if their needs aren’t being fully met, that’s the right thing
to do.”
No comments:
Post a Comment